Back to my Roots

I grew up at summer camp.

More specifically, at diabetes camp.

So when I officially registered for Beyond Type 1 x Connected in Motion's 2019 Maine Slipstream weekend, I was more than a little excited. I mean, this was the stuff of (my) life. Camp is in my blood. And now to go back as an adult, doing adult things (AKA drinking wine, higher rope courses, etc.)? I was extremely privileged to have this opportunity.

Maine did not disappoint. Seven hours and seven states north, my diabuddies and I pulled off the interstate and into the quaint town of Winslow. After about ten minutes, we approached a sign, almost masked by the leafy trees, that read "Camp Caribou." We had arrived. The camp was nestled at the end of a long dirt road, on the edge of large lake. It was abundant with all the camp necessities - volleyball court, waterfront, dusty wooden cabins and, of course, campers!

Over 80 adults living with type 1 diabetes, along with staff living with it as well, attended Slipstream. I felt a rush of nostalgia as we unpacked our bunks, did awkward icebreakers, and had a nighttime bonfire. It was so nice to be able to have an open and honest discussion about living with type 1. About its ups and downs, and about the responsibilities that come with being an adult with this disease. I was amazed to hear the different walks of life people came from - some had been living with type 1 for less than a year, while others had spent over 40 years with it. People came from out of town, out of state, and even out of country! I nestled into my cot that night smelling of bug spray with a smile on my face.

The next day was full of opportunities to play outside. I climbed a 50 ft wall at high ropes, did some paddle boarding, and played a spontaneous game of volleyball with my fellow campers. Throughout the day, sessions were held exploring everything from mindfulness to technology, all with a focus on type 1, and led by people living with it. 

I was lucky enough to grow up attending camp for kids with type 1. It was so nice to see other people who had never had this experience before have it for the first time. Listening to their awe about being surrounded by other people with diabetes was touching.

So what do you pack for a weekend at camp?

Bug Spray.

Seriously. You're gonna need it. Spray it outside the cabin. And even though you use it, you'll still leave with bug bites.

Layers.

Maine is COLD compared to NJ. I regret not packing a second sweatshirt. Bottom line, pack a variety of layers. And always pack extra underwear.

Warm Pajamas.

No matter where you are, in the woods it's cold in the morning and at night. Grab some pajama pants and fuzzy socks. And an extra blanket.

An Extra Pair of Shoes.

Ya know, just in case you get thrown in the lake. Or fall in.

Another angry blog post about insurance

...Because what else is new, right?

But seriously, what I want to vent about is insurance deciding what is or isn't medically necessary. Let's break this down: 

You go to your physician, who attended upwards of 8 years of schooling to become a MD. They evaluate you, hopefully take your input as a patient, form a medical opinion and a plan of care, write a prescription or two and send you on your way. You go to your pharmacy to pickup your medication, only to find that your insurance company has denied coverage of this prescription. They feel it is not medically necessary, or they have a "preferred alternative" that they do cover.

This is something we've unfortunately all grown used to. But let's just pause a moment. And let that sink in.

First of all, preferred by who? Not by me, the person who's going to be ingesting/injecting/applying the medication. Not by my doctor, who prescribed medication in the first place. But I mean, what value are our measly preferences in this situation, right?

Second of all, our insurance company is determining what our medical needs are. So what, then, is the point of seeing a physician in the first place? Why not just go directly to the insurance company and seek their medical opinion? Oh, that's right. Because they're not physicians.

To play devil's advocate, doctors are employed by insurance companies to conduct clinical reviews of prescriptions. However, are these doctors the most appropriate people to be doing this review? In short, no. When my Fiasp was up for review to determine what level of coverage it would receive, the review was conducted by a PhD. No shade to PhD's, but if someone's reviewing my insulin needs, I think it should be, maybe, I don't know, an endocrinologist? Perhaps my endocrinologist? One who isn't employed by a company that profits from denying coverage of the medication I'm seeking? I mean, we are literally asking people to make a determination that will either harm their own company, or harm us. And they've never met us. Which way are they more likely to go? Does conflict of interest not play a role here?

It's a very backwards system, to say the least. We go to doctors to get appropriate care. But then we're met with roadblocks to actually receive that care. For people with chronic illness, dealing with this for a lifetime is draining and aggravating. We should explore a system that makes it easier for people to live their best, most healthy lifestyle. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. If we keep people healthy, we avoid future hospitalizations and prolonged illnesses. And in turn, avoid future expenses our insurance will have to cover. So what is the end game for them? Are they just stuck in that phase of childhood development in which they have no ability to engage in delayed gratification?

End rant.

(For now).

Community Versus Identity

The other night I was snuggled up at home, catching up on the latest episode of The Good Doctor. I was drawn in to a particular sub-plot of the episode. One of the main characters, who is receiving chemo, finds himself being pestered by his neighbor in the treatment room to join their cancer support group. Long story short, the character resists for the whole episode, arguing that he doesn't want cancer to define his life, it's not who he is, he doesn't need a support group, all that jazz. In the end, he comes around, and joins his chemo neighbors for a game of cards. 

Throughout the course of this, I couldn't help but think about how many times I've heard this dialogue before - whether it's about diabetes or any other chronic illness. People don't want to be defined by their condition (understandably so). Because of this, it's common for people to push away when approached with support groups or communities for people who share their diagnoses. We want to be more than our diagnoses, so we don't want to over-identify with it.

But here's the thing - there's a difference between identity and community. Belonging to a community of type 1 diabetics doesn't mean that you yourself are only diabetes and nothing else. Your identity is still yours. Sure, diabetes and the community are a part of your identity, but they are not the whole thing.

We can't always change what we're living with. We can't make diabetes go away. So why not find solace in the fact that there are others out there who share our struggle? You may find that they don't like to over-identify with their disease either. You may not even talk about diabetes when you're together. But having that support system there undoubtedly inserts a positive aspect into living with a disease that you cannot change.

Where is the love?

Healthcare has been a hot button issue lately here in the states. Of course for those of us who live with a chronic illness, it has always been an issue. But with the 2016 election, healthcare along with many other public policies have come to the forefront of the nationwide conversation. And frankly, the conversations have been quite alarming.

There is an overwhelming population of people who believe that healthcare has to be earned. That the right to live is not an inherent right for all humans (even though our US Constitution specifically states otherwise). People feel that if you work hard, pay your dues, and play by the rules, you will A: Stay healthy, and B: Be granted great insurance coverage, God forbid anything should happen to you. This logic is flawed. Chronic and/or acute health issues can happen to anyone, at anytime, for a variety of reasons. As a species, humans don't like to believe this. It creates what's called "cognitive dissonance," which is when we are presented with a reality that doesn't match up with what we've always believed. It therefore causes dissonance, or disruption, so we do everything in our power to ignore the reality and continue on with our faulty beliefs. We cannot reconcile reality with our wishes because it causes discomfort.

Most people grow up hoping or believing that they will have good health. This is normal - it's a positive outlook on life. However, as we grow older we tend to experience certain realities - maybe we're diagnosed with type 1 diabetes, someone we love is in an accident, our parent gets laid off and we almost lose our insurance - and we are able to shift our beliefs accordingly to read more like this: things may not always be easy. Things could happen to us and our family. But for some people, this adjustment doesn't happen. They continue to believe that bad things come to those who deserve it and that healthcare should be earned.

So is the issue that people are inherently bad and have complete disregard for others? I hope not. No, what I think is happening in the majority of cases is that people are simply rigid in their beliefs due to concerns about their own self-preservation. And this needs to change. We need to challenge our beliefs because they are flawed. Yes, it is a frightening reality to accept - that we could be struck with an illness or hit by a car at any time. But we are doing more harm than good by holding on to the flawed belief that we are in total and complete control of our health or our circumstances. It is not reality.

The reality is, every human has an inherent right to live. And for some humans, what they need to live - and live well - is a bit more extensive than what others need. So I challenge you all - what belief do you cling to that begrudges others their inherent rights? How can you start to chip away at that belief and re-frame it?

Using Anger as a Tool - The Global Insulin Crisis

Being a social worker means I'm rarely surprised by anything. We are often witness to every kind of  bizarre and disturbing occurrence out there. We work in the medical field and see people struggle with a complicated healthcare system while trying to care for themselves or their children. But every news story that blasts through the screen about another diabetic dying from insulin rationing hits me like a punch in the gut.

Insulin prices have been slowly climbing over the past decade. It's a reality that seems to have been kept under wraps - except, of course, from the patients and families who have been struggling in silence each year their copay goes up. As someone who's been privileged enough to not have this issue constantly weighing on me, I could easily turn a blind eye to it. Mutter "yeah, that's a shame," and go about my everyday life. I'll be frank - this path is tempting. This is a beast  of an issue that has numerous parties involved, and differs from nation to nation. In a recent New York Times article regarding insulin prices, Danielle Ofri wrote, "It's hard to know where to direct my rage." And it is. It's overwhelming. Where do we begin? The only answer I can formulate is this: we start with raising our voices. And this has already started: with numerous articles like Ofri's, protest trips to Mexico to exhibit pricing differences, TV news features, and type 1 advocates blasting pharmaceutical companies on social media. Now that the fire is catching, we have no choice but to roll with it.

To be clear, insulin prices are an issue everywhere - not just in the USA. While insulin in Mexico may be affordable for us, it is not the case for most residents of the country. Insulin prices looked at as a percentage of income paints a better picture of the bleak reality. Aside from countries like Canada and England who have universal healthcare, insulin prices are unmanageable for most populations. The cost of living with diabetes takes up the bulk of individuals' or families' income, leaving people scrambling for rent, food, and other necessities.

Info-graphic created by T1International

While coming up with the money is the initial struggle for most, an issue that is specific to the US is the ability to then get your hands on insulin. You need a prescription. You need that prescription submitted. Maybe it gets denied. Then it needs pre-authorization. Then it gets approved, but you have a bigger co-pay than expected. Then you have to download a co-pay card (if you qualify). And then you can pick up your insulin. This process can take days at best, weeks at worst. And contrary to what many people may think, not everyone has the time to be battling on the phone with insurance and refereeing between the doctor, insurance, pharmacy and pharmacy benefit managers (PBM). We do have lives outside of diabetes.

This issue isn't specific to insulin, either. The price of test strips are exorbitant. They are considered a luxury in many 3rd world countries. Even here, some insurance companies (mine included) only cover enough strips for 3 tests a day. To get coverage for more, a letter of medical necessity is needed. In what world does someone with type 1 only need to test 3 times  a day? It's clear that insurance regulations don't seem to be based on diabetes care best practices recommended by physicians.

As I said, it's a beast of an issue. And it angers me. A lot. Instead of sitting on that anger or turning a blind eye, I decided to get involved. Becoming an advocate for T1International is step one for me. T1International is a non-profit that takes no donations from pharma companies and advocates for people all over the world to have access to the medications and education they need.

Enough of suffering through this issue in silence. We're demanding change. We're not waiting. We want #insulin4all, and we want steps to be taken towards it starting now. If you want to get involved, check out T1International, search the hashtag #insulin4all on social media, and check out what other diabadasses have been doing below.

• Libby Russell at I Have the Sugars is selling statement tees to benefit T1International.
• Robin Cressman raises her voice and led a group of type 1s across the border to purchase insulin in Mexico to protest accessibility and pricing issues. 

The Power of Words

"Words are, in my not-so-humble opinion, our most inexhaustible source of magic." - Albus Dumbledore. 

Sticker from Pimp My Diabetes

There has always been conversation in the chronic illness community about language - whether to say "diabetic/asthmatic/etc." versus "person with diabetes/asthma/etc." Some people don't like being on the receiving end of a label, while others strongly identify with one, and others still have no preference. I don't believe there is one simple answer as to which is best. I believe it's best to explore with the individual how they wish to be identified when referring to their diabetes (or any other chronic illness). It's also important to remember that that person is a person, whether they are comfortable with being called by their illness or not. They may be comfortable with you calling them a diabetic, but don't forget - that's not all they are.

So many nuances exist in communication. If someone casually asks "you're diabetic?" versus a brash "you're a diabetic?", I'm likely to have different reaction. There's so many nonverbal cues - body language, tone, facial expression. No one wants to feel that someone is accusing them of something, and most people don't like to be the recipient of sad puppy eyes. The words themselves aren't the whole picture. But they're a big part of it.

Compliance vs. Adherence

I've talked before about the word compliance in the medical field and the negative connotation it can have. The word "comply" is so similar to "obey." People living with chronic illness are already stuck with a disease they didn't ask for. Admonishing them for not "obeying" to this illness will convey that you're on the illness' side, not theirs. Because of how long and how heavily the word has been used, it's gained a derogatory nature . Hearing "non-compliant" being used to describe someone feels like hearing a dirty word. It stains a person's medical record, strikes trepidation into most providers, and causes bias when assessing a person, whether you realize it or not. There have been recommendations to switch to the word "adherent," which to me makes more sense and is kinder. Asking if someone is adhering to their regimen acknowledges the patient's role in their illness, while creating a comfortable space for them to have a conversation about what their barriers are to self-care.

Control vs. Manage

Recently I was listening to Rob Howe's podcast, Diabetics Doing Things, and came across his interview with Erin Aker, founder of the Diabulimia Helpline. In her interview she talked about the word "control," and how detrimental it can be for mental health. While control is important for diabetes management, intense desire for control can manifest into different forms of anxiety. Especially when it comes to managing a chronic illness that is so difficult to control. 

While I've had my own struggles with control and fear of losing it, I've never given much consideration to the power the word itself holds and how we can shake that power. Aker talked about using the word "management" versus "control." I felt like a light bulb went off in my head. Such a simple shift - swapping out one word for another - could make such a difference. If we keep thinking about our diabetes in terms of control, we're more prone to become obsessive. Re-training our brain to use the word "manage" eases some of the pressure. It is a more benign word, from a mental health perspective. I encourage everyone in the chronic illness community to consider what Aker talked about.

What language do you prefer when it comes to your diabetes? Do you have a preference? Many people say words don't matter to them as much as the content of the conversation. Comment below and let me know your thoughts.

Making Endo Visits Suck Less

It's no secret that we all dread going to the endo. No matter how much we like our docs, there always seems to be a level of anxiety that accompanies us to the office. If nothing else, this visit is a strong reminder of the chronic illness that we are living with and managing every day. After more than 20 years of doctor visits and a handful of different endocrinologists, I've learned some ways to make these trips suck a little less.

Treat. Yo. Self.

This idea was actually inspired by my older brother. Like most normal humans, once a year he goes for blood work. He's not the most comfortable with docs and needles, so after his appointment he stops for a Snickers bar. After hearing my mom talking about this I thought, why don't I get in on that?

It doesn't have to be candy (unless you're low). It can be something a little more betes-friendly, and it doesn't have to only be before/after your endo appointment. When I go into the pharmacy to pick up my medications, I look for a little something for myself. Whether it's a mini-cactus for my office, a Justin's PB cup, or a new face mask; it makes the trip a little happier. 

After my endo appointment I'll do a little something more - stop at Starbucks or Playa Bowls, or I'll book a facial for the same day. It can be something small (or big!), but you get the general idea - do something pleasant for you.

Write out your questions.

If you're like me, you have a lot of thoughts that gather in the couple months between appointments. It's easy to let these float around in your head and then have your mind go totally blank once your butt hits the exam table. This can lead to feeling flustered and defeated after the appointment. Something I've started doing is writing down my thoughts and questions as they come, and bringing the list with me when I go to the doctor. That way, when my doc asks how things are going I actually have something productive to work on.

Stand your ground.

It's essential as a type 1 to have an endo who is willing to work with you. Someone who is on your team, not trying to act as your boss. If you have ideas - taking a pump vacation, switching insulin, trying a sensor - speak up! This is your time to advocate for yourself. Your doc may not be on board right away, but they should listen to your input and hear what you have to say. After all, you are the one living with this disease 24/7.

Bottom Line.

Medical management can be boring, at best. But mixing in little joys and treats when we can acts to improve our outlook and quality of life.